Date:  Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:44:39 -0500
From:  Brent Epp <brent (at mark) pdcweb.net>
Subject:  [coba-e:09666] Re: Upgrade to CentOS5
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <5s1ihs$5d1es3 (at mark) wnpgmb02-c600c.mts.net>
In-Reply-To:  <AEDA79F0-D1E4-4979-AD78-31B7593E4D07 (at mark) kommunity.net>
References:  <F3C39080-9B4F-43E9-B66C-3B0082DA9A6B (at mark) kommunity.net> <200704231112.57002.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net> <AEDA79F0-D1E4-4979-AD78-31B7593E4D07 (at mark) kommunity.net>
X-Mail-Count: 09666

I don't know, I think the idea is that only HTTP 
bandwidth is limited on a per-site 
basis.  mod_cband makes this stupidly easy, GUI or not.

Of course, if there can be an easy way to limit 
bandwidth by specific parameters (protocol, port, 
etc.) via the GUI, I think I'd be all for it then.

  - Brent

At 2007-04-23 06:17, you wrote:
>Hi Michael,
>
>IMHO Bandwidth limitation should be done by IP-Stack/Firewall.
>I've never Used this function at a Cobalt so i would remove this
>funktion if it is too much work or to much customisation!
>
>At FreeBSD there is a Port called raqdevil which uses PHP5, so maybe
>the work is allready done?
>
>
>Tom MÍler-Kortkamp


Brent Epp
mailto:brent (at mark) pdcweb.net