Date:  Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:49:33 +1100
From:  Greg Kuhnert <greg.kuhnert (at mark) theanchoragesylvania.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:09090] Re: Anti-spam suggestions
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <45F5222D.8020408 (at mark) theanchoragesylvania.com>
In-Reply-To:  <200703120031.l2C0VLop010526 (at mark) info.eis.net.au>
References:  <200703120031.l2C0VLop010526 (at mark) info.eis.net.au>
X-Mail-Count: 09090

I have just upgraded to Brian's latest mailscanner package... (and I 
also have his spamassassin package). The two combined is a knock-out.

Users can release mail from a quarantine themselves. Users can mark 
false positives as ham and vice versa. It's a winner for me!

Regards,
Greg.

User Ernie wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have tried Spamassassin via procmail, and Mailscanner which
> uses Spamassassin as well, on several different BQ servers, in all cases a high
> volume of spam still seems to get through despite training. In particular a
> lot of these spams with random dictionaly words in the body and subject. 
>
> Does anyone one have a good quality anti-spam solution to suit a BQ server
> they can suggest?
>
>
>
>   


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.