Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:07:11 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_M=F8lsted?= <molsted (at mark) iweb.dk> Subject: [coba-e:09087] Re: Anti-spam suggestions To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org Message-Id: <5BA85F51-25BF-4CF2-9018-4028BA2C6D9C (at mark) iweb.dk> In-Reply-To: <200703120031.l2C0VLop010526 (at mark) info.eis.net.au> References: <200703120031.l2C0VLop010526 (at mark) info.eis.net.au> X-Mail-Count: 09087On 12/03/2007, at 1.31, User Ernie wrote: > Hi all, > I have tried Spamassassin via procmail, and Mailscanner which > uses Spamassassin as well, on several different BQ servers, in all > cases a high > volume of spam still seems to get through despite training. In > particular a > lot of these spams with random dictionaly words in the body and > subject. > > Does anyone one have a good quality anti-spam solution to suit a BQ > server > they can suggest? We use DSPAM on our servers - it works just smoothly. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/ -- Rene9087_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)