Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:07:11 +0100
From:  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_M=F8lsted?= <molsted (at mark) iweb.dk>
Subject:  [coba-e:09087] Re: Anti-spam suggestions
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <5BA85F51-25BF-4CF2-9018-4028BA2C6D9C (at mark) iweb.dk>
In-Reply-To:  <200703120031.l2C0VLop010526 (at mark) info.eis.net.au>
References:  <200703120031.l2C0VLop010526 (at mark) info.eis.net.au>
X-Mail-Count: 09087

On 12/03/2007, at 1.31, User Ernie wrote:

> Hi all,
> I have tried Spamassassin via procmail, and Mailscanner which
> uses Spamassassin as well, on several different BQ servers, in all  
> cases a high
> volume of spam still seems to get through despite training. In  
> particular a
> lot of these spams with random dictionaly words in the body and  
> subject.
>
> Does anyone one have a good quality anti-spam solution to suit a BQ  
> server
> they can suggest?

We use DSPAM on our servers - it works just smoothly.
http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/

-- 
Rene
	

9087_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)