Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:24:44 +0100 (CET)
From:  Jes Kasper Klittum <jes (at mark) enavn.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:08720] Re: Update php-PEAR with NUONCE PHP 5.1.2
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <3965823.1170318284025.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun (at mark) www.mailmotel.net>
In-Reply-To:  <004301c74591$60b704d0$1e64a8c0 (at mark) nuonce.net>
References:  <45C0989B.6010805 (at mark) enavn.com> <004301c74591$60b704d0$1e64a8c0 (at mark) nuonce.net>
X-Mail-Count: 08720

On Feb 01, 2007 12:41 AM, Brian N. Smith <brian (at mark) nuonce.net> wrote:

> 
> Yes, it is. NuOnce (mine) installs in /usr/local. That is where Pear
> is actually installed.  The 4.3.9 is installed in /usr.
> 
> Pear should be installed into;
> /usr/local/share/pear/PEAR/
> 
> Give that a try.
> 
> Also, all of the binaries are here;
> /usr/local/bin/pear
> /usr/local/bin/peardev
> /usr/local/bin/pecl
> /usr/local/bin/php
> /usr/local/bin/php-cgi
> /usr/local/bin/php-config
> /usr/local/bin/phpize

Now, I have no knowledge of PHP, I am just checking this for a customer,
so am I getting you right if I think that you are saying that I do not
need to upgrade PEAR on the server, because it is already included in
your PHP release?

When I do: rpm -qa | grep pear
I get:
php-pear-4.3.9-3.22

This seems to be an old version, but running pear -V gives me:

PEAR Version: 1.4.9
PHP Version: 5.1.5
Zend Engine Version: 2.1.0

That seems to be the new version? I am a bit confused.

When you say "Pear should be installed into /usr/local/share/pear/PEAR",
do you mean "it is installed there" or "it could be installed there"?

pear -V shows that I am using version 1.4.9, that is pretty recent is it
not?

Jes