Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Thu, 4 Jan 2007 05:52:14 -0500
From:  "Will Nordmeyer" <will (at mark) willspc.net>
Subject:  [coba-e:08478] Re: vacation.pl not working
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <059801c72fee$65b37490$6600a8c0 (at mark) hundredacrewood.willspc.net>
In-Reply-To:  <20070104113450.73fcb982 (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg>
X-Mail-Count: 08478

I'm having the same problem.

What should be checked on the pl files?

Should they be mail:mail as well?

I have no owvacation.pl in /etc/smrsh (not /usr/adm/sm.bin) only a
vacation.pl pointing to openwebmail's - it is owned by root:root.

/usr/local/sbin/vacation.pl is owned by root:root

/var/www/cgi-bin/openwebmail/vacation.pl is owned by root:mail

The <username.db> owner is username:site# - with owner rw permissions only.

--Will

> -----Original Message-----
> From: patricko [mailto:patricko (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 10:35 PM
> To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
> Cc: raqnerd (at mark) gmail.com
> Subject: [coba-e:08476] Re: vacation.pl not working
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> things to check.
> 
> <username>.db permission must be mail.mail
> 
> 
> 
> /home/openwebmail/cgi-bin/openwebmail/vacation.pl
> /usr/adm/sm.bin/owvacation.pl
> /usr/adm/sm.bin/vacation.pl
> /usr/local/sbin/vacation.pl
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers
> patrick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:29:18 +0800
> patricko <patricko (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > openwebmail uses its own vacation perl script.
> > You have to disable bluequartz vacation.pl
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > patrick
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:05:41 +0100
> > "RAQ Nerd" <raqnerd (at mark) gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Check that the vacation message it creates in the users home
> directory iw
> > > > readable, I have had some strange problems with openwebmail vacation
> > > > messages as well even though I don't link to it's vacation .pl in
> > > > /etc/smrsh.
> > >
> > > Hi Ernie,
> > >
> > > thanks for your answer.
> > >
> > > I checked this of course, I even tried 777... No luck.
> > > Anyone any idea? Patricko, Brian, Shibuya? :)
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.