Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:58:20 +0100
From:  Jes Kasper Klittum <jes (at mark) enavn.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:07793] Re: POPS, SMTPS and IMAPS errors
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <45471E3C.6060008 (at mark) enavn.com>
In-Reply-To:  <20061030154014.M39176 (at mark) vaporised.com>
References:  <4541B165.4020806 (at mark) enavn.com> <4545DE69.2060903 (at mark) enavn.com> <20061030122606.M14154 (at mark) vaporised.com> <4545FE67.3040001 (at mark) enavn.com> <20061030154014.M39176 (at mark) vaporised.com>
X-Mail-Count: 07793

Vapor wrote:
> I never changed the "ssl_ca_file" option (left it commented out), I assume this then 
> uses "/usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt". This contains info on my Thawte certs giving 
> them a working chain of authority. I assumed this would not need changing at all unless 
> you are using an unlisted CA or a self-signed cert (which would still not benefit from 
> changing).
> 
> I only changed the paths for:
> 
> ssl_cert_file = /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem
> ssl_key_file = /etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem
> 
> To point to my cert and key files.
> 
> For self signed I had to import the cert into the root auth tree on any client windows 
> boxes though to avoid the chain error, not a hard task though with Internet Exploder.
> 
> I'd try undoing your change to the "ssl_ca_file" first and restarting, but on grepping /
> usr/share/ssl/certs/* for "modo" brings no joy, maybe you need to add some other 
> support for Comodo? I know most common browsers have them in now, as proven by your web 
> site setup working. No clue as to how you'd go about adding it to email though.
> 
> Unfortunately it's the actual encryption I'm more interested in that the reselling of 
> the service, so once it was working on my few Thawtes and self-signed's I stop working 
> on it.
> 
> It would be nice however that when a cert was added and setup as working in the gui, 
> the email server at least responded over SSL for it I agree, seems like such a waste. 
> Fair enough we are aware of the single IP per cert limitation but surely that can't be 
> too hard to restrict either.
> 
> All in all it suffices for a moderate tweakers of in house systems like me, but totally 
> unsuitably for reselling SSL encrypted email services as it stands now...
>
Okay - using your info, I actually got IMAPs, and POPs working on a 
server. I actually needed to point to the Comodo CA file, otherwise it 
would not work. However, SMTPS still fails miserably, still complaining 
about the sendmail.pem file.

I will try fiddling with it and post my discoveries.

/Jes