There is a majordomo 2.0 that I found as a fork that was being used by some
University in North Caroline. However, that would be a lot of work. Yes,
it is probably a good idea to go to mailman as much as I love and I am used
to majordomo.
On 10/26/06 4:07 PM, "Paul Aviles" <paul.aviles (at mark) nickelnetworks.com> wrote:
> Opps.. bad keyboard....
> It makes sense since according to Brent Chapman from GreatCircle "(the
> development effort is essentially dead).". This was back in Nov 2004, plus
> mailman has a lot more features as you mentioned than majordomo. Chris
> Hedemark did port mailman for the Raq3/4 in 2002 so it is possible.
>
> Paul Aviles
> Nickel Networks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hayes [mailto:shayes (at mark) officetracker.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:12 PM
> To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
> Subject: [coba-e:07727] Re: Majordomo confirmed bugs
>
> Is it time to get Mailman working with BQ? I for one have used Majordomo for
> about 5 years and would love to have the features of mailman.
>
> I never use the UI for list management of Majorodomo list since I came from
> the raq4 which also would overwrite the config files and list additions from
> the UI. I manually change my config files and subscribe and unsubscribe
> through email.
>
> Just my two cents on the Majordomo issue.
>
> Scott,
>
> At 08:56 AM 10/26/2006, you wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Paul Aviles wrote:
>>
>>> There are three bugs that I have confirmed with the latest majordomo
>> package
>>> majordomo-1.94.4-13BQ4.
>>
>> Plus.....
>>
>> Any addresses added via an email, i.e., subscribe thelist send to
>> majordomo (at mark) thedomain.com are not visable via the GUI....AND the GUI
>> overwrites the subscriber list and therefore the emailed subscriber
>> addresses are lost.
>>
>> So, it would appear the majordomo in BQ is NOT a mailing list...it's an
>> email announce program that doesn't work well.
>>
>> Thom
>
>
>
>