Date:  Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:25:23 -0700
From:  Bbt Lists <mailinglists (at mark) backbonetechnology.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:07661] Re: CMU issues raq 4r to BQ - Problem installing package component
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <453930B3.7020902 (at mark) backbonetechnology.com>
In-Reply-To:  <1261635.1161375348679.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun (at mark) www.mailmotel.net>
References:  <027b01c6f441$0a4fa080$0301a8c0 (at mark) Jerrycp> <45390E6E.6060502 (at mark) digitalcollision.com> <453919A7.9090004 (at mark) digitalcollision.com> <1261635.1161375348679.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun (at mark) www.mailmotel.net>
X-Mail-Count: 07661

Jes Kasper Klittum wrote:
> I know it's dirty, but did you try installing the pkg with the --nodeps
> flag? Sometimes the rpm packers put in a dependency, when the software
> will run just fine on an older version og the program in question. I
> woild try forcing the installation with the --nodeps option, and then
> doing a dry-run migration to test it out. If every things seems fine,
> then go ahead.
>
> Jes
>
>   
>> Ok - I have been digging even deeper, and upgraded to v 2.27 of CMU - 
>> well that is still not new enough for the BQ CMU - it needs v 2.29.
>>
>> I was hoping that I could even find an older version of CMU. I tried 
>> 2.27 - it installed, and I tried V 2.33 and it failed with the same 
>> dependency.
>>
>> Has anyone got a "hail mary" for me and by chance have a copy of V
>> 2.29
>> archived any where?
>>
>> Dustin
>>
>>     
>
>
>   
This is true.... I had sort of thought of that, but was worried about 
doing it with production.... since if I forced the update, and it did 
not work - then my original CMU would be pooched...



-- 
dnk