Date:  Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:31:47 +0200
From:  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom_M=FCller-Kortkamp?= <tmueko (at mark) kommunity.net>
Subject:  [coba-e:06666] Re: [RFC] bluequartz with postfix MTA
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <1F92C0CD-1C3C-4C2B-A736-9A059B99FC56 (at mark) kommunity.net>
In-Reply-To:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0609010145580.1727-100000 (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0609010145580.1727-100000 (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg>
X-Mail-Count: 06666

I prefer Sendmail: It's native in CentOS and RH. I love Clamav- 
milter. The OpenBSD-guys think that it is save enough ... And when  
change: why postfix and not exim?


tmueko

Am 31.08.2006 um 19:54 schrieb patricko (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg:

> Hi blues,
>
>
>      We have BQ-dovecot replacement for pop3 and imap.
>
>      Now it is time for sendmail replacement / alternative.
>
>       postfix? anyone?
>
>
>      I personally looked at glue code in BQ and
>       compared with postfix architecture.
>
>      Hmm... Havent probe deeper
>
>      But on the surface, it seems minor changes are needed to replace
>       sendmail with postfix.
>
>     Anyone has done it?
>      So that we wouldnt waste resource to "re-invent the wheel".
>
>
>
> Cheers
> patrick
>
>

-- 
kommunity GmbH & Co.KG
Tom MÍler-Kortkamp
Netzwerke & Internet
Goseriede 4
D-30159 Hannover

Phone +49 (0)5 11 - 80 72 58 0
Fax +49 (0)5 11 - 80 72 58 10
http://www.kommunity.net