Date:  Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:28:09 -0700
From:  dnk <mailinglists (at mark) backbonetechnology.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:06374] Re: Sun replaced Cobalt -- Why?
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <44E22E59.9060603 (at mark) backbonetechnology.com>
In-Reply-To:  <44E228DD.8080402 (at mark) schneiderheim.com>
References:  <b1aab89a0608150915n2394d5adq97735e03c8fe53f8 (at mark) mail.gmail.com>	 <44E213D2.9030105 (at mark) schneiderheim.com> <f76f5d3e0608151214h687bfdd0x309d9ac941b76cf (at mark) mail.gmail.com> <44E228DD.8080402 (at mark) schneiderheim.com>
X-Mail-Count: 06374

Wayne Schneider wrote:
> Thank you for the response.  You answered exactly what I asked.  
> However, I failed ask what I wanted to know.  What I'm really after is 
> what Sun product replaced the RaQ and Qube products and are they an 
> improvement?  If so, in what way?
> 
> Wayne

There was no SUN product that replaced the raqs. They discontinued them. 
Then release the code for the web gui under the BSD license. BlueQuartz 
is the project started by the people who picked up the coding of the web 
Gui for a more generic Linux flavor.

The short of it is:

There was no SUN product that replaced the raqs.

=-)

Dustin