Date:  Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:56:51 +0100
From:  "Colin Jack" <colin (at mark) mainline.co.uk>
Subject:  [coba-e:05799] Re: Redundancy
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <F07DD4D0940AFF41A207BE85479D2AFF180D56 (at mark) server.mainline.local>
X-Mail-Count: 05799

Already got that ... but not going to help if the PSU blows and takes =
the motherboard out!
=20
I need a virtually seamless changeover in the case of a disaster. This =
stuff is colocoed 2 hours drive away!
=20
Colin
=20


________________________________

	From: Support [mailto:support (at mark) domain-nameit.net]=20
	Sent: 19 June 2006 16:39
	To: Colin Jack
	Subject: Re: [coba-e:05797] Redundancy
=09
=09
	use RAID-1
	=20


	Colin Jack <colin (at mark) mainline.co.uk> wrote:

		I am not an linux expert, but was wondering whether in principal the
		following is 'do-able' ...
	=09
		Have CMU backup to an FTP server every night and then have another
		backup server running cmuImport every night on a cronjob to duplicate
		the other server. Then if the primary goes down we could have some =
sort
		of heartbeat monitor that switches across to the backup. Yes, users =
may
		get some dupe mail, but apart from that everything should carry on
		before ... or am I being na=EFve here?
	=09
		Colin
	=09
	=09
	=09



	
5799_2.html (attatchment)