Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Sun, 28 May 2006 01:36:41 +0800
From:  patricko <patricko (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg>
Subject:  [coba-e:05426] Re: Very slow performance
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Cc:  paulw (at mark) swiftinter.net
Message-Id:  <20060528013641.58b320d0 (at mark) localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To:  <002f01c680a2$2120c1d0$0800a8c0 (at mark) office.swiftinter.net>
References:  <002f01c680a2$2120c1d0$0800a8c0 (at mark) office.swiftinter.net>
X-Mail-Count: 05426

Hi,



Do:

 ps -eo\%cpu,\%mem,size,rss,pid,cmd  |sort -rnk1 | head -20



capture the 20 lines at dump it back to this list



Cheers
patrick 



On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:55:20 +0100
"Paul Wilson - Swift Internet" <paulw (at mark) swiftinter.net> wrote:

> Hello
> 
> We recently put a bluequartz server into use, replacing a raq550 which had 
> 212 domains.
> 
> The CMU was very slow and the server has a problem with performance.
> 
> We have disabled reverse DNS in the FTP and qpopper configs and modified the 
> /etc/pam.d/pop3 file to look like
> 
> auth requisite /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
> auth requisite /lib/security/pam_shells.so
> #auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so shadow nullok
> #account required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
> auth required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth shadow nullok
> account required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> 
> I am aware of the mods that Brian at nuonce suggested and have tried them, 
> but it it does not seem to have had any major difference.
> 
> In essence, using the admserv control panel, drives the CPU loading into 
> double figures.
> 
> Has anyone else experienced this issue and is there a workaround?
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paul W
> ________________________
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Swift Internet, and is
> believed to be clean.
>