The Reply-code says: it is a transient problem with the Mailbox... to
be more clean:
RFC-1893 thinks: Mailbox full!
X.2.2 Mailbox full
The mailbox is full because the user has exceeded a
per-mailbox administrative quota or physical capacity. The
general semantics implies that the recipient can delete
messages to make more space available. This code should be
used as a persistent transient failure.
4 at the beginning as it is not a permanent problem(hopefully)
Tom
Am 09.05.2006 um 06:30 schrieb Damien Pepper - Centralhosts Webhosting:
> Can anybody explaint to me please some causes of this? We are
> using a bluelinq box to
>
> receive mail for xyz.com.au and everyone can send to it except on
> mail server.
>
>
>
>
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; computesolutions.com.au
>
> Arrival-Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:45:00 +1000
>
>
>
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; xyz (at mark) xyz.com.au
>
> Action: delayed
>
> Status: 4.4.1
>
> Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.xyz.com.au
>
> Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:52:33 +1000
>
> Will-Retry-Until: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:45:00 +1000
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Damien Pepper
>
> Centralhosts - Webhosting Specialists
>
> P: 1300 300 726
>
> F: (03) 9587-7951
>
> E: damien (at mark) centralhosts.com.au
>
>
>
>
--
kommunity GmbH & Co.KG
Tom MÍler-Kortkamp
Netzwerke & Internet
Goseriede 4
D-30159 Hannover
Phone +49 (0)5 11 - 80 72 58 0
Fax +49 (0)5 11 - 80 72 58 10
http://www.kommunity.net