Date:  Thu, 4 May 2006 20:26:14 +0200
From:  "Arthur Sherman" <cobalt-list (at mark) compros.co.il>
Subject:  [coba-e:05023] Re: The ongoing QPOPPER Debate
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <027701c66fa8$404d1460$3701a8c0@lapxp>
In-Reply-To:  <00fd01c66f96$816e60f0$2f427dd1@chrism>
X-Mail-Count: 05023

> I've also made these changes.  The only solution was to move 
> heavy traffic sites to another server.  I also think that I/O 
> to the disk is a bottleneck. 
> I have tried replacing Qpopper with Dovecot and got the same 
> results.  On my next server I plan on putting some enterprise 
> Western Digital drives in to see if they perform any better.

This doesn't explain why raqs with quite outdated disks happily handle 90+
concurrent connections, doesn't it?



Best,

--
Arthur Sherman

+972-52-4878851
CPTeam  


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by ComPros Team Mail server, and is
believed to be clean.