Date:  Thu, 04 May 2006 09:47:27 -0500
From:  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Ing=2E_Ernesto_P=E9rez_Est=E9vez=22?= <info (at mark) ecualinux.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:05016] Re: The ongoing QPOPPER Debate
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <445A13FF.80502 (at mark) ecualinux.com>
In-Reply-To:  <006101c66f75$56e85000$1e64a8c0 (at mark) nuonce.net>
References:  <006101c66f75$56e85000$1e64a8c0 (at mark) nuonce.net>
X-Mail-Count: 05016

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hum

I tried that too, but it didn't solve my problem at the end. As
connections continue growing the problem reappeared again.

regards
epe

Brian N. Smith wrote:
> To all,
> 
> I have had this problem to.  Yesterday I made a very small change, and I
> "think" it seems to have cleared it up some.  KNOCK on wood, but I haven't
> received any Active Monitor emails about CPU Utilization, or any complaints
> at all.
> 
> I know eventually it will be switched to Dovecot, but if anyone wants to
> try
> my "magical" fix.
> 
> Edit: /etc/xinetd.d/pop3
> 
> Change: server_args = in.qpopper -s
> To: server_args = in.qpopper -s -R
> 
> The -R says NOT to do a reverse lookup.  Like I said, remarkably it
> seems to
> have fixed it.  I haven't seen 10-15 POP3 processes like I have been
> seeing.
> It seems to have made the box very happy.  If someone who is having the
> same
> problem can try it, and let me know if I am smoking crack, or does this
> actually make a big difference?
> 
> The only thing that I noticed to, is that PAM is just sometimes really
> slow.
> Any good how-tos on speeding it up?
> 
> Thanks,
> Brian
> 

- --
Ing. Ernesto PñÓez Estñ×ez
http://www.ecualinux.com
USA: + 1 404 795 0321
Ecuador: (02)3412402 - (09) 9246504
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEWhP/8sSWs7RP4EMRAtXtAKCMUGqDrhFaqSFPg7PLIa/3TUbfEwCeN8KA
1kflwBwFoaWtrGeQcRG311Y=
=lqbC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----