Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:57:23 +0800 (SGT)
From:  patricko (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg
Subject:  [coba-e:04737] Re: help
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0604181356120.11431-100000 (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg>
In-Reply-To:  <004d01c6624c$fa2122f0$2f427dd1@chrism>
X-Mail-Count: 04737

Hi,


Faster I/O definitely going to help.

eg:
9 SCSI disks on RAID 5



Cheers
patrick





On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Chris McGinnis wrote:

> I tried optimizing qpopper and then moving to Dovecot.  Neither solution 
> worked for me.  Even Dovecot would timeout under heavy load.  I solved the 
> problem by moving some of my heavy traffic sites to another box.  I'm 
> wondering if a faster hard drive would help out with the I/O timeouts on the 
> disk.  I'd also like to know if maildir would be a better solution than the 
> current mbox format used.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: ""Ing. Ernesto PñÓez Estñ×ez"" <info (at mark) ecualinux.com>
> To: <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:46 AM
> Subject: [coba-e:04717] Re: help
> 
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi Carlos
> >
> > this has been discussed several times on the list.
> >
> > My guess (as genius) is that qpopper working via xinetd is too slow to
> > handle too much load (or too few).
> >
> > I ended by compiling and installing dovecot as suggested on this list
> > previously and this nightmare went away finally.
> >
> > It is really annoying indeed.
> >
> > Is there anything else I can help you?
> >
> > regards
> > - --
> > Ing. Ernesto PñÓez Estñ×ez
> > http://www.ecualinux.com
> > USA: + 1 404 795 0321
> > Ecuador: (02)3412402 - (09) 9246504
> >
> >
> > Carlos Alperin wrote:
> >> I'm not the one that originate the e-mail, but since you're the genius 
> >> let's ask:
> >>
> >> I have CentOS 4.3 on a P4 3.0 GHz, 4 GB Ram and 250 GB HD on Raid 1 just 
> >> for /home.
> >>
> >> We have problems with in.qpopper that gaves timeout all the time. We 
> >> tried to install
> >> Dovecot last week & didn't work. Then we change some parameters 
> >> like -s -R -S on one
> >> of the configuration files of the qpopper, and we have no problems during 
> >> the last 4
> >> days.
> >>
> >> Today, with the high traffic, the problems show up again.
> >>
> >> Any clue how to fix this?
> >>
> >> Any good procedure to move to Dovecot or some other POP handler?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Carlos Alperin
> >> Seneca Communications, LLC
> >>
> >> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:22:34 -0500, Ing. Ernesto PñÓez Estñ×ez wrote
> >> Im the Genius of the lamp, how may I help you?
> >>
> >> Diego Lo Giudice wrote:
> >>>>> Help
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> --
> >> Ing. Ernesto PñÓez Estñ×ez
> >> http://www.ecualinux.com
> >> USA: + 1 404 795 0321
> >> Ecuador: (02)3412402 - (09) 9246504
> >
> >> --
> >> Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
> >
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iD8DBQFEQ8ZR8sSWs7RP4EMRAh1TAKDQ8bWGCh1xYVF4y4d91V7GRBbYwACeK3q+
> > WZ/js3xWzeWCoSP2KFBiDLc=
> > =iESI
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > 
> 
> 
>