Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Fri, 7 Apr 2006 06:49:02 +0100
From:  "Taco Scargo" <taco (at mark) scargo.nl>
Subject:  [coba-e:04526] Re: Majordomo admin_body issue
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <20060407054902.M22614 (at mark) scargo.nl>
In-Reply-To:  <95F8E2BB-9B01-4AAF-8726-C236B29F2247 (at mark) alpha.or.jp>
References:  <025301c659bb$1b7bc350$14001fac (at mark) DELLP4TACO> <95F8E2BB-9B01-4AAF-8726-C236B29F2247 (at mark) alpha.or.jp>
X-Mail-Count: 04526

Hisao,

Have you commented out the bitching code (like it was on the RaQ550)
or did you comment out the $admin_body = undef; ?

Taco

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:34:00 +0900, Hisao SHIBUYA wrote
> Hi
> 
> > I migrated a RaQ4 to a new BQ box this week and see I am  
> > experiencing the 'admin_body bitching message'.
> > I have commented out the code that bitches at me in /usr/local/ 
> > majordomo/resend, but as majordomo is actually part of BQ I was  
> > wondering why this issue is present.
> >
> > I have majordomo-1.94.4-13BQ3 on my box. Yum does not show a newer  
> > update.
> 
> I checked majordomo.cf.template again. It isn't commented out  
> $admin_body line.
> I think that it is already fixed before, but it isn't fixed yet.
> 
> Now, I fixed this issue and make new majordomo package, and then 
> I'll  release update.
> 
> Hisao