Date:  Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:08:46 -0600
From:  "Chris McGinnis" <chrism (at mark) t3wireless.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:04254] Re: Optimizing qpopper or POP3 alternative
To:  <info (at mark) ecualinux.com>
Cc:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <0fb901c64140$a4ba8f40$2f427dd1@chrism>
References:  <72b101c63eed$c703e3d0$2f427dd1 (at mark) chrism> <4408927A.604 (at mark) ecualinux.com>
X-Mail-Count: 04254

What version of Dovecot did you install and how did you install it?  The 
qpopper thing is getting way out of hand on a production server and I need 
to get it resolved ASAP.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: ""Ing. Ernesto PñÓez Estñ×ez"" <info (at mark) ecualinux.com>
To: <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:01 PM
Subject: [coba-e:04248] Re: Optimizing qpopper or POP3 alternative


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I installed dovecot and was able to get rid of this problem. qpopper was
> a bit slow... and dovecot solved that situation.
>
> epe
>
> Chris McGinnis wrote:
>> I have setup a machine with NuOnce CentOS + Bluequartz.  I have migrated 
>> 100 virtual sites from a RaQ 550 and have run into problems with qpopper.
>>
>> After a while there will be 50+ qpopper instances running and client 
>> connections will timeout saying:
>> -ERR POP EOF or I/O Error
>>
>> Any recommendations on optimizing qpopper or possibly replacing qpopper 
>> with something else?  All of these sites came from a RaQ550, I would 
>> expect my new server to handle the load just fine.
>>
>> The specs on the machine are: 3.2Ghz, 2GB ram, SATA 200GB HDD
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>>
>
> - --
> Ing. Ernesto PñÓez Estñ×ez
> http://www.ecualinux.com
> USA: + 1 404 795 0321
> Ecuador: (02)3412402 - (09) 9246504
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFECJJ68sSWs7RP4EMRAklmAKCPyAYygp/fvhM/f1PjPfSHslASPQCg8Ee2
> 2JSUL8a9P8zJHQh8lspYk+4=
> =AyJ/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>