Hi,
I agreed
Sendmail 8.12 and above, require this
to work
Cheers
patrick
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:43:59 +0900
Hisao SHIBUYA <shibuya (at mark) alpha.or.jp> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Brian N. Smith wrote:
> > Feature Change Request.
> >
> > Right now, with the site preview (nice addon), it seems to break the
> > default virtual site. I know the BQ team removed the default addon
> > site, which I ended up putting back on my CD. The problem is that a lot
> > of people have downloaded it (that isn't the problem) and now they loose
> > that virtual site.
>
> Yes, I remove to make default virtual site after wizard process.
> I'm agree that many people expect the virtual site after wizard. But, this
> process has some sendmail problems with cgi and vacation mail, such as User
> unknown here error or Data format error. So I remove the process to make
> virtual site and not allow to make a virtual site which FQDN is same as
> server FQDN.
>
>
> > As it stands right now
> >
> > /usr/sausalito/handlers/base/apache/server.pl
> >
> > Gets called to basically add Aliases for the preview function. BUT, the
> > file that it creates "server.conf" over rides the default virtual site,
> > as it is called way up in the httpd.conf via this line:
>
> Exactly. server.conf over rides the virtual site settings for server FQDN.
> The default virtual site is same as server FQDN, and then default virtual
> site doesn't work correctly.
>
>
> > If there is a better way to add this functionality, I am all for it, but
> > I think setting up an additional virtual site isn't the way to go,
> > especially if it has a negitive effect on trying to access the box via
> > the IP address only.
>
> I want to know your opinion with the following,
> About default virtual site.
> - Do you need to make the default virtual site via wizard process?
> If yes,
> - How does user enter the FQDN for default virtual site via wizard process?
> It means, user enter two FQDN, server FQDN and default virtual site FQDN.
>
> On my opinion, user doesn't allow to add the virtual site same as server
> FQDN which case of sendmail issue.
> - How do you think about this?
>
> These above question is for that I need to know what change for wizard is
> better for a lot of users.
>
> But, I recognize a lot of server has the virtual site same as server FQDN,
> so we need to some action to fix this issue.
> I'm agree with your idea to access via IP address only.
> I'll change the handler and server.conf to use IP address only.
>
> Regards,
> Hisao