>>
>> Right now, with the site preview (nice addon), it seems to break the
>> default virtual site. I know the BQ team removed the default addon
>> site, which I ended up putting back on my CD. The problem is that a lot
>> of people have downloaded it (that isn't the problem) and now they loose
>> that virtual site.
>
> Yes, I remove to make default virtual site after wizard process.
> I'm agree that many people expect the virtual site after wizard. But, this
> process has some sendmail problems with cgi and vacation mail, such as
> User
> unknown here error or Data format error. So I remove the process to make
> virtual site and not allow to make a virtual site which FQDN is same as
> server FQDN.
>
>
>> As it stands right now
>>
>> /usr/sausalito/handlers/base/apache/server.pl
>>
>> Gets called to basically add Aliases for the preview function. BUT, the
>> file that it creates "server.conf" over rides the default virtual site,
>> as it is called way up in the httpd.conf via this line:
>
> Exactly. server.conf over rides the virtual site settings for server FQDN.
> The default virtual site is same as server FQDN, and then default virtual
> site doesn't work correctly.
>
>
>> If there is a better way to add this functionality, I am all for it, but
>> I think setting up an additional virtual site isn't the way to go,
>> especially if it has a negitive effect on trying to access the box via
>> the IP address only.
>
> I want to know your opinion with the following,
> About default virtual site.
> - Do you need to make the default virtual site via wizard process?
> If yes,
> - How does user enter the FQDN for default virtual site via wizard
> process?
> It means, user enter two FQDN, server FQDN and default virtual site
> FQDN.
>
> On my opinion, user doesn't allow to add the virtual site same as server
> FQDN which case of sendmail issue.
> - How do you think about this?
>
> These above question is for that I need to know what change for wizard is
> better for a lot of users.
>
> But, I recognize a lot of server has the virtual site same as server FQDN,
> so we need to some action to fix this issue.
> I'm agree with your idea to access via IP address only.
> I'll change the handler and server.conf to use IP address only.
>
> Regards,
> Hisao
>
Using the newest ISO, I have had some problems with scripts sending email
and giving the User unknown here error or Data format error.
I would favor a solution that would not force me to edit the sendmail line
in 1000s of my customers scripts to get them to work.
----
Ken Marcus
Precision Web Hosting, Inc.
http://www.precisionweb.net