Hi Brian,
Brian N. Smith wrote:
> Feature Change Request.
>
> Right now, with the site preview (nice addon), it seems to break the
> default virtual site. I know the BQ team removed the default addon
> site, which I ended up putting back on my CD. The problem is that a lot
> of people have downloaded it (that isn't the problem) and now they loose
> that virtual site.
Yes, I remove to make default virtual site after wizard process.
I'm agree that many people expect the virtual site after wizard. But, this
process has some sendmail problems with cgi and vacation mail, such as User
unknown here error or Data format error. So I remove the process to make
virtual site and not allow to make a virtual site which FQDN is same as
server FQDN.
> As it stands right now
>
> /usr/sausalito/handlers/base/apache/server.pl
>
> Gets called to basically add Aliases for the preview function. BUT, the
> file that it creates "server.conf" over rides the default virtual site,
> as it is called way up in the httpd.conf via this line:
Exactly. server.conf over rides the virtual site settings for server FQDN.
The default virtual site is same as server FQDN, and then default virtual
site doesn't work correctly.
> If there is a better way to add this functionality, I am all for it, but
> I think setting up an additional virtual site isn't the way to go,
> especially if it has a negitive effect on trying to access the box via
> the IP address only.
I want to know your opinion with the following,
About default virtual site.
- Do you need to make the default virtual site via wizard process?
If yes,
- How does user enter the FQDN for default virtual site via wizard process?
It means, user enter two FQDN, server FQDN and default virtual site FQDN.
On my opinion, user doesn't allow to add the virtual site same as server
FQDN which case of sendmail issue.
- How do you think about this?
These above question is for that I need to know what change for wizard is
better for a lot of users.
But, I recognize a lot of server has the virtual site same as server FQDN,
so we need to some action to fix this issue.
I'm agree with your idea to access via IP address only.
I'll change the handler and server.conf to use IP address only.
Regards,
Hisao