Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:17:59 +0000
From:  Dogsbody <dan (at mark) dogsbody.org>
Subject:  [coba-e:15019] Re: Rant about BlueQuartz
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <49940567.7030901 (at mark) dogsbody.org>
In-Reply-To:  <4993A2E0.60606 (at mark) virtbiz.com>
References:  <581572.91231.qm (at mark) web65608.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4993A2E0.60606 (at mark) virtbiz.com>
X-Mail-Count: 15019


> I'm not advocating that all BQ users jump ship to BX this instant.   I 
> think I'm more saying I'm not sure I would recommend another BQ 
> installation if you were putting up a new box.

Chris, I don't think anyone is arguing with you regarding a new box and 
I realise that moving from CentOS4 to CentOS5 requires a fresh install. 
  The difference is that CentOS4 is still supported while BlueQuartz isn't!

It would be nice to move from one supported product to another supported 
product instead of what has happened now where all updates have stopped 
for BQ forcing us to move to BX immediately.  BlueQuartz has basically 
done a Cobalt!!

I am currently turning customers away because I don't have the time to 
setup new BQ servers and I certainly don't have time to buy new servers 
and migrate everyone to BX immediately.

My point in particular was that ALL of this was avoidable!!!  It should 
have been BlueQuartz that ventured into Centos5, instead they killed it!


> Thank GOODNESS that those involved didn't just give up and walk away.

IMHO I think most of them did!  Not knocking anyone that is still here, 
as has been said many many times, you are all amazing and I truly 
believe that.  We have still lost one hell of a lot of talent though 
from helpers on the mailing list to developers to people that could have 
just helped raise bugs..... GONE

Dan