Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:38:12 +0100
From:  Dogsbody <dan (at mark) dogsbody.org>
Subject:  [coba-e:14195] Re: New BQ install...
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <48FE67E4.1080201 (at mark) dogsbody.org>
In-Reply-To:  <48FE6624.2070207 (at mark) bagpipes.net>
References:  <000001c933c2$21e5a560$65b0f020$ (at mark) net> <48FE53C7.8030704 (at mark) bagpipes.net> <000501c933ca$d6de19e0$849a4da0$ (at mark) net> <48FE6624.2070207 (at mark) bagpipes.net>
X-Mail-Count: 14195


> I used BQ 4.6 myself with no problem
> 4.8 was a lemmon

!!??  I have used 4.8 on a number of installs with no problem!?

Within reason (nothing too old) it doesn't actually matter which of the 
installs you use as as soon as you `yum update` you will get to the same 
(latest) level.

Dan