Date:  Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:50:50 -0700
From:  "Ken Marcus - Precision Web Hosting, Inc." <kenmarcus (at mark) precisionweb.net>
Subject:  [coba-e:13961] Re: AW:  Re: sendmail question
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <3A43731761A64D6C96B227AE1A0CA29E@OfficeKen>
References:  <VPOP31.5.0l.20080910182828.510.2d7f.1.505a6688 (at mark) t1.tec1.net> <200809111940.06521.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net> <F8AEA842D451411D9CED6CBF3F8F011D (at mark) x2> <200809120850.17524.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
X-Mail-Count: 13961


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Stauber" <bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
To: <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:50 PM
Subject: [coba-e:13948] Re: AW: Re: sendmail question


> Hi Florian,
>
>> maybe it should be made bq standard then, or are there any potential
>> downsides?
>
> There aren't any downsides that I'm aware of. I'll see what I can do about
> making it standard.
>
> -- 
> With best regards,
>
> Michael Stauber
>

I'd prefer it to be Standard, but I can add it manually as I do for quite a 
few other sendmail options.

For the security scanner companies, it's not a matter of spam but of  a 
script using the verify  to help determine what your usernames are.


----
Ken Marcus
Ecommerce Web Hosting by
Precision Web Hosting, Inc.
http://www.precisionweb.net