Date:  Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:  mailing list <sunlist (at mark) yahoo.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:13954] Re: AW:  Re: sendmail question
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <887433.36740.qm (at mark) web63804.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:  <200809120850.17524.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
X-Mail-Count: 13954


--- On Thu, 9/11/08, Michael Stauber <bq (at mark) solarspeed.net> wrote:

> > maybe it should be made bq standard then, or are there
> any potential
> > downsides?
> 
> There aren't any downsides that I'm aware of.
> I'll see what I can do about 
> making it standard. 

Let's not.  Anyone who wants to make a certain changes can do so and they can recall what they make the changes to.

1) If we make too many changes as standard, it'll be too difficult to troubleshoot the platform down the road.

2) Different individuals have different preferences and requirements and are likely to submit theirs to be standard in bq, this opens a can of worm.

Regards,


Mike