Article 13948 at 08/09/12 15:50:33 From: bq (at mark) solarspeed.net Subject: [coba-e:13948] Re: AW: Re: sendmail question

Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:50:16 +0200
From:  Michael Stauber <bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
Subject:  [coba-e:13948] Re: AW:  Re: sendmail question
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <200809120850.17524.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
In-Reply-To:  <F8AEA842D451411D9CED6CBF3F8F011D@x2>
References:  <VPOP31.5.0l.20080910182828.510.2d7f.1.505a6688 (at mark) t1.tec1.net> <200809111940.06521.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net> <F8AEA842D451411D9CED6CBF3F8F011D (at mark) x2>
X-Mail-Count: 13948

Hi Florian,

> maybe it should be made bq standard then, or are there any potential
> downsides?

There aren't any downsides that I'm aware of. I'll see what I can do about 
making it standard. 

-- 
With best regards,

Michael Stauber