Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
From:  "Greg Schiedler" <Greg (at mark) Limo.Net>
Subject:  [coba-e:13314] Re: BQ Design Suggestion
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <2494.75.145.76.142.1213471665.squirrel (at mark) www.limo.net>
In-Reply-To:  <00ca01c8ce46$2e698900$8b3c9b00$ (at mark) co.uk>
References:  <4853E5D5.70702 (at mark) elirion.net>    <4853f49a.2a528c0a.2b0e.6dfe (at mark) mx.google.com>    <00ca01c8ce46$2e698900$8b3c9b00$ (at mark) co.uk>
X-Mail-Count: 13314

I'm not great with PHP but I'm curretnly trying WHMCS out on a limited
basis.  For anyone who is interested I will attach the generic PHP to
interface with WHMCS.  If anyone can configure a full intergation I would
be interested.

Greg :-)

> Hi Doug,
>
> You could use something like WHMCS or AWBS  *http://www.whmcs.com or
> http://www.awbs.com* both are fairly cheap non expensive to implement.
>
> I see that Jim is creating / created an API tool, so you could hook WHMCS
> or
> AWBS quite easily, both give you a blank canvas to integrate hosting
> panels.
> I know I mentioned last year on the AWBS forum about BQ, and Ernie (who I
> believe is in this list) stated everything is there to do it.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Chris Pelling
> NetEarth One, Inc.
> reseller.netearthone.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Harvey [mailto:ohgoodiee (at mark) gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 June 2008 17:46
> To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
> Subject: [coba-e:13310] Re: BQ Design Suggestion
>
> Richard, Have a very good point there!
>
> So what are the options for provisioning/billing?  So far, all I've run
> into
> are way to expensive for a start-up.
>
> Doug
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Siddall [mailto:cobalt (at mark) elirion.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 8:38 AM
> To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
> Subject: [coba-e:13309] Re: BQ Design Suggestion
>
> Doug Harvey wrote:
>> Hi Richard. That's why I suggested the PKG idea that you could buy. I
> don't
>> think it's a bad idea at all. It could be made where when someone is
>> installing, there would be a choice to leave it out.  I do understand
>> that
>> there would be a lot to think about as far as implementation.  But I
>> still
>> do not think it's a bad idea.
>>
>> Doug
>> Sleepycathosting.com
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Sorry, it's still not a good idea.  It's actually a very bad idea as you
> don't want to run your billing system on the same computer that provides
> shared hosting.
>
> Look at it this way.  You said you want to automatically switch off
> hosting for people who fail to pay their bills.  Presumably you're
> letting people pay by credit card.  Presumably, you keep a credit card
> on file so that you can automatically bill them.  You don't want to keep
> customer credit card numbers on a machine that is easily hacked such as
> a shared hosting server.
>
> You want to keep customer information on a physically secure, firewalled
> server, separate from insecure machines like shared hosting servers.
> Sure, your billing server wants to talk to your hosting servers so it
> can keep up to date with the changes your customers are making,
> provision new accounts, etc., but it can use the command line tools over
> SSH, or the web services API that Jim Scott is working on, or something
> similar.
>
> Also, see question 1.6 on the Payment Card Industry Data Security
> Standard (PCI/DSS) self-assessment questionnaire:
>> 1.6
>> Is payment card account information stored in a database
>> located on the internal network (not the DMZ) and protected by
>> a firewall?
> https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/pdfs/pci_saq_v1-0.pdf
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Regards,
>
> 	Richard Siddall
>

Scanned for Virus by http://Barracuda.Limo.Net

13314_2.zip