Sorry to keep replying to my own posts, but:
--- Dan Kriwitsky <webhosting (at mark) yahoo.com> wrote:
> Everyone that is getting past the access map has (may be forged)) in the
> header. I wonder if somehow whatever function in Sendmail inserts that,
> is
> interfering with it being blocked? Or, the fact that sm-client wasn't
> running? But, lots of other mail was being blocked by access while
> sm-client wasn't running.
>
Well, it's not sm-client. That was running just fine now when this spam
that should have been rejected by access was allowed in. Again, the (may be
forged) line is present.
> /map access customer.static.ip.paetec.net
map_lookup: access (customer.static.ip.paetec.net) returns REJECT (0)
Return-Path: <rebecka.davie (at mark) mayr-glatzl.at>
Received: from 63-138-182-110.customer.static.ip.paetec.net
(63-138-182-110.customer.static.ip.paetec.net [63.138.182.110] (may be
forged))
by [my server] (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m55EcXDE022327
for <me (at mark) example.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:38:37 -0500
Received: from [63.138.182.110] by pmail.utanet.at; Thu, 5 Jun 2008
09:38:37 -0500
Message-ID: <01c8c6ef$edd98c80$6eb68a3f (at mark) rebecka.davie>
From: "Susanna Burnett" <rebecka.davie (at mark) mayr-glatzl.at>
To: <me (at mark) example.com>
Subject: 150 + H = 75
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:38:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-2";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2905
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2905
--
Dan Kriwitsky