Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:01:53 -0600 From: "Rodrigo Ordonez Licona" <rodrigo (at mark) xnet.com.mx> Subject: [coba-e:13158] Re: SMTPS triggering chkrootkit infected port To: <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org> Message-Id: <200806042053.m54KrL9r026677 (at mark) ana.xnet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <DB3B5127-01B5-4DE6-B4D4-37551DE9ED66 (at mark) rainstormconsulting.com> X-Mail-Count: 13158We have learned to live with this false positives. portsentry also rises this kind of false positives. HTH Rodrigo O _____ From: Jeremy Knope [mailto:jerome (at mark) rainstormconsulting.com] Sent: Martes, 03 de Junio de 2008 08:33 To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org Subject: [coba-e:13147] SMTPS triggering chkrootkit infected port I've searched around the net abit on this matter without much help. Anybody know why BQ's secure SMTP triggers chkrootkit's "INFECTED (PORTS: 465)" when obviously it's a legit SMTPS service. Is there a way to not have this happen and continue using SMTPS? Thanks! -- Jeremy Jeremy Knope Web Programmer Rainstorm Consulting <http://www.rainstormconsulting.com> : http://www.rainstormconsulting.com "Designing Strategies for Internet Success." jerome (at mark) rainstorminc.com Phone: 207-866-3908 Fax: 207-866-029713158_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)