Date:  Thu, 22 May 2008 23:17:19 +1000
From:  Greg Kuhnert <greg.kuhnert (at mark) theanchoragesylvania.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:13043] Re: Error creating new site
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Cc:  Michael Stauber <bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
Message-Id:  <4835725F.3050105 (at mark) theanchoragesylvania.com>
In-Reply-To:  <200805212308.10672.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
References:  <200802061632520859.01400266 (at mark) mail.loosle.com> <200805211749.26467.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net> <46e901c8bb67$7ea09d60$967da8c0 (at mark) thomasferrari> <200805212308.10672.bq (at mark) solarspeed.net>
X-Mail-Count: 13043

Michael Stauber wrote:
>> I actually did the following and found 2 sites with the same user:
>> find /home/.sites/ -name test
>> /home/.sites/123/site19/.users/17/test
>> /home/.sites/132/site21/.users/17/test
>>     
>
> Yeah, that's not supposed to happen: A user that belongs to two sites at 
> once. :o)
>   
Let me be bold for a moment, and ask a dumb question for a moment. Why?

Yes, I know it cant be done at a unix level - but why cant we create 
users in a more appropriate format - using for example their email 
address as their username?

What parts of BQ will break if we moved to a system that used for 
example test (at mark) domain1.com, and test (at mark) domain2.com as two unique usernames?

Regards,
Greg.