Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:  mailing list <sunlist (at mark) yahoo.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:12527] Re: AW:  Re: Mailing list slowness
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <636000.10947.qm (at mark) web63814.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:  <012d01c89a5a$ab02a2f0$6401a8c0@MALAPTOP>
X-Mail-Count: 12527


--- Michael Aronoff <ma (at mark) ciic.com> wrote:

> Original Message:
> > 1 hour is slow for internet and email ;-) especially when you're looking
> for
> > help to your bq server.
> > 
> > I have setup a list  (at mark) yahoogroups.com...
>  
> I appreciate the good intention in setting up a Yahoo group but
> fragmentation would be very bad for a small group like this.
> 
> I would also submit that if you need help quicker than one hour you probably
> should be paying a consultant rather than expecting the list to save the
> day.  An hour seems totally reasonable to me for a list like this.

I'm not attempts to fragment the list or expecting the list to save the day. 
However, I preferred to see more traffic/responses and allow other users to
interact and be more active rather than wait an hour.

I have invited Hisao and Yasu to the list and they can own/manage it.  With
high-speed, always-on, 21st century, etc. am I the only individual here that
feels email took an hour for delivery is slow?

In addition, with the list moving a public forum/provider it is less likely to
be unavailable and more open for others.  BQ is a nifty product and could use
more exposure and more members.


Mike


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com