Date:  Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:46:46 +0200
From:  "Florian Arzberger" <arzberger (at mark) maxxnet.de>
Subject:  [coba-e:12526] AW:  Re: AW:  Re: Mailing list slowness
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <092101c89a69$af34b610$6302a8c0@x2>
In-Reply-To:  <571308.39651.qm (at mark) web63813.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
References:  <20080409150142.M54755 (at mark) howie.co.uk> <571308.39651.qm (at mark) web63813.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
X-Mail-Count: 12526

mailing list <mailto:sunlist (at mark) yahoo.com> schrieb am Mittwoch, 9. April 2008
18:45:

>> an hour delay isn't that much of a problem.
> 
> I think an hour is still too long for email (mailing list).  I
> preferred to receive email instantly and an option to read/reply at
> my leisure versus waiting an hour.  There might be a topic/thread
> that users might respond to quicker and spawn more responses from
> other users, etc.  Whereas, a delay could cause users an opportunity
> to join in the conversation.     
> 

an hour is still to long, but it's better than three ;). mail delivery
should always be as fast as possible.