Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:54:58 +0000 From: "James Mcloughlin" <laserfox (at mark) gmail.com> Subject: [coba-e:12310] Re: Now StrongBolt Rant topics To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org Message-Id: <bd69a7150803200954j6a3c5a61w7494c320aae92021 (at mark) mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BAY129-DAV1754C63BFF3B73831CEEB1CA0E0 (at mark) phx.gbl> References: <000001c88235$4bfda210$0101a8c0 (at mark) systemax> <47D4B314.9020003 (at mark) virtbiz.com> <0b6d01c882af$ac842c10$6302a8c0 (at mark) x2> <BAY129-DAV1754C63BFF3B73831CEEB1CA0E0 (at mark) phx.gbl> X-Mail-Count: 12310Apologies to all for not being a more active member.Hello Zeffie!I understand that you have been very active in your efforts to slam otherpeoples products!Hello BlueQuartz developers!Hello BlueQuartz users!Hello Strongbolt users!Thank you for bringing the PR_SET_DUMPABLE. exploit to my attention Zeffie,you were quite right that the kernel had not been updated for a while.You must have spent a while going through the exploit lists trying to findone that works.Anyhoo, we have released a new kernel that is available from the followingURL:http://www.osoffice.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=605As for your patched Cobalt OS being PCI compliant, I am sceptical.How can you keep redhat 7 patched all by yourself?I am not saying that newer is better, -- erm well, actually I am.Jimbobosoffice.co.ukOn 10/03/2008, Zeffie <bluequartzlist (at mark) hotmail.com> wrote:>> gee thanks for accusing me of a Rant... all I did was point out the> Kernel> has never been updated and that public hacks exist... but to answer you=r> question>> > i was just curious what somebody might have to> > rant about it.>> <this is not a rant but instead a response>>> My list would include....>> it's a kernel with much more then a RaQ could support compiled in.>> The display drivers and not the standard Cobalt ones and require special> programs to work>> the displayed information is not as clean as a RaQ2>> The kernel uses to much memory>> it also uses some very outdated software including dovecot which this> thread> was about.>> The bios update required has actually trashed several Raq's and in some> cases even for experienced long term Cobalt users...>> They lie on there site about the updates I have made>> When they made the kernel the public hack already existed... so actually> they shipped a know bad kernel>> Support is limited as I have heard from several people looking for help> with> very strange problems> (some you can google)>> They spammed more then one forums including my own to sell there product.>> They tell people the solution to there problem is to buy there software> and> use that.. even for easy fixes...>> The guy has a "real job" and doesn't have time to support his work>> now I'm sure I could add more but I don't have time for this bs. I hope> this helps to answer your question though.>> </this is not a rant but instead a response>>> --> Zeffie...> http://www.zeffie.com/> Now I build it and You surf it!> Cobalt RaQ Repairs, Development, and Maintenance.> Home of the Worlds Largest Collection of RaQ Updates!> Cobalt Spam Filter, Security, Firewall, Anti Virus Products.> Yahoo: wwwZeffie ... Aim: wwZeffie ... Msn wwZeffie (at mark) hotmail.com ...> US 734-446-0350 734-454-9117 US Toll Free 800-231-4459 UK 0208-150-6860> ----- Original Message -----> From: "Florian Arzberger" <arzberger (at mark) maxxnet.de>> To: <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:07 AM> Subject: [coba-e:12228] AW: Re: AW: Re: PWDB and Dovecot... The db is jus=t> fine and to remove it is a step backwards...>>> > Chris Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet <mailto:cobaltfacts (at mark) virtbiz.com>> schrieb> > am Montag, 10. MçÓz 2008 05:04:> >> >> Gerald Waugh wrote:> >> Kernel version alone is a pretty poor determination of a system's> >> overall health or value. To say otherwise would present a fairly> >> myopic view.> >> > i know... i like strongbolt. i was just curious what somebody might hav=e> > to> > rant about it.> >> >> >> >>>>12310_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)