gee thanks for accusing me of a Rant... all I did was point out the Kernel
has never been updated and that public hacks exist... but to answer your
question
> i was just curious what somebody might have to
> rant about it.
<this is not a rant but instead a response>
My list would include....
it's a kernel with much more then a RaQ could support compiled in.
The display drivers and not the standard Cobalt ones and require special
programs to work
the displayed information is not as clean as a RaQ2
The kernel uses to much memory
it also uses some very outdated software including dovecot which this thread
was about.
The bios update required has actually trashed several Raq's and in some
cases even for experienced long term Cobalt users...
They lie on there site about the updates I have made
When they made the kernel the public hack already existed... so actually
they shipped a know bad kernel
Support is limited as I have heard from several people looking for help with
very strange problems
(some you can google)
They spammed more then one forums including my own to sell there product.
They tell people the solution to there problem is to buy there software and
use that.. even for easy fixes...
The guy has a "real job" and doesn't have time to support his work
now I'm sure I could add more but I don't have time for this bs. I hope
this helps to answer your question though.
</this is not a rant but instead a response>
--
Zeffie...
http://www.zeffie.com/
Now I build it and You surf it!
Cobalt RaQ Repairs, Development, and Maintenance.
Home of the Worlds Largest Collection of RaQ Updates!
Cobalt Spam Filter, Security, Firewall, Anti Virus Products.
Yahoo: wwwZeffie ... Aim: wwZeffie ... Msn wwZeffie (at mark) hotmail.com ...
US 734-446-0350 734-454-9117 US Toll Free 800-231-4459 UK 0208-150-6860
----- Original Message -----
From: "Florian Arzberger" <arzberger (at mark) maxxnet.de>
To: <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject: [coba-e:12228] AW: Re: AW: Re: PWDB and Dovecot... The db is just
fine and to remove it is a step backwards...
> Chris Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet <mailto:cobaltfacts (at mark) virtbiz.com> schrieb
> am Montag, 10. MçÓz 2008 05:04:
>
>> Gerald Waugh wrote:
>> Kernel version alone is a pretty poor determination of a system's
>> overall health or value. To say otherwise would present a fairly
>> myopic view.
>
> i know... i like strongbolt. i was just curious what somebody might have
> to
> rant about it.
>
>
>
>