Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:24:27 -0600
From:  Chris Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet <cobaltfacts (at mark) virtbiz.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:12191] Re: AW:  PWDB and Dovecot...  The db is just fine and to remove it is a step backwards...
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <47D1EACB.7040407 (at mark) virtbiz.com>
In-Reply-To:  <BAY129-DAV67139FD10384C967DAC4CCA0C0 (at mark) phx.gbl>
References:  <BAY129-DAV11BA311E49C6F1BC925713CA130 (at mark) phx.gbl> <0a2c01c88092$49de5ff0$6302a8c0 (at mark) x2> <BAY129-DAV67139FD10384C967DAC4CCA0C0 (at mark) phx.gbl>
X-Mail-Count: 12191

Zeffie wrote:
> I think it's safe to say that most programmers laugh at people using 
> flat files for databases and the concept is very outdated...  I would 
> have to suggest you take up the using a database vs. a flat file with 
> the database loving programmers...  I'm sure they can give you lot's of 
> reasons...

I think it's probably safer to say that most folks, programmers, 
engineers, businesspeople, whatever, will say "give me what works!"   LOL!

I see the point though.   You're saying why go back in technology when 
you can fix the newer, "better" technology.

Go with the approach that works best for your application.