Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:31:55 +0100
From:  "Florian Arzberger" <arzberger (at mark) maxxnet.de>
Subject:  [coba-e:12184] AW:  PWDB and Dovecot...  The db is just fine and to remove it is a step backwards...
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <0a2c01c88092$49de5ff0$6302a8c0@x2>
In-Reply-To:  <BAY129-DAV11BA311E49C6F1BC925713CA130 (at mark) phx.gbl>
References:  <BAY129-DAV11BA311E49C6F1BC925713CA130 (at mark) phx.gbl>
X-Mail-Count: 12184

Zeffie <mailto:bluequartzlist (at mark) hotmail.com> schrieb am Freitag, 7. MçÓz 2008
16:55:

> I have heard a lot of talk about changing back to the old passwd
> system since the passwd db blows up.  I can't help but feel this is a
> step backwards to a system I'll slowly be back to rebuilding passwd
> and shadow files when they become corrupt.   
> 
> The problem with this is that nobody ever read the conf file and
> stopped dovecot from starting way to many auth sessions via the
> "Double the children processes" system it employs.  
> 
> The real solution is a slightly different conf and an updated version
> of dovecot that contains the following changes and or bug fixes... 
> 

all i can say to this is that the "convert to flat" approach worked fine for
me and i don't see any downsides.