Date:  Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:07:51 +0200
From:  Arthur Sherman <arturs (at mark) netvision.net.il>
Subject:  [coba-e:11777] Re: Project "Ellis" announcement
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <010c01c85f53$4b72fb10$e5b418ac@dell>
In-Reply-To:  <20080101174459.0a8c5b32@patricko>
X-Mail-Count: 11777

> Hi Blues
> 
> When I am working on porting and writing documentation.
> 
> 
> 
> I came across a question that I am not able to answer myself. 
> ("I cant convince myself openldap is better than FDS")
> 
> 
> 
> Openldap vs. Fedora Directory Service (FDS).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> FDS is defacto for Redhat Distro and Openldap is considered 
> second class.
> 
> Openldap is small in footprint (w/o GUI) vs. FDS http-based 
> management.
> 
> 
> Which is better for Bluequartz?
> 
> 
> Cheers
> patrick


I just googled for FDS and read abouts on project page.
It seems WOW...
Especially SASL w/ Kerberos, encryption, web...

Might be I missed it, but whether it allows for shared contacts handling
across domain?


Best,
--

Arthur Sherman