Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:47:43 -0600
From:  Scott Hayes <shayes (at mark) officetracker.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:11682] Re: dealing with spam
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <200801082143.m08LhEmI008123 (at mark) raq.officetracker.com>
In-Reply-To:  <4783DA3A.90804 (at mark) nomealaska.org>
References:  <4783DA3A.90804 (at mark) nomealaska.org>
X-Mail-Count: 11682

Jim,

I use the user logon settings in the BQUI to delete the mail that is 
caught by SpamAssassin . I use the NuOnce package.

At 02:16 PM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
>I have a server bought from RaqWare and it has SpamAssassin and 
>MailScanner installed, though I have not yet played with any configs on them.
>
>I have a user that is getting over a hundred spam messages and 
>doesn't want to see them. The messages have [SPAM] appended to the 
>subject. I was going through the archives looking for a solution for 
>this user and I found a response from Paul in 2006 that I thought I 
>would try, but wanted to make sure it was still ok and still a 
>recommended procedure. Here it is:
>
>"
>
>Edit /etc/procmailrc
>
>Add..
>
># Delete messages with spam score 7 or higher
>:0
>* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
>/dev/null
>Change the number of * to alter what you want....
>
>"
>
>I went ahead and did that that (I can undo if necessary), but have a 
>question. He said to change the number of * to alter what you want. 
>This I don't understand - would it be subtracting/adding a slash 
>asteric ( \* ) to the end of the middle line, or adding an * to the 
>front of that line? I don't understand that syntax.
>
>I think by doing this it will rid all of us of spam that is ranked 7 
>or higher. I think I would rather do this on a per user basis, but 
>if that isn't possible/easy with what I have, then no biggie. Any 
>advice appreciated.
>
>cheers, Jim
>
>--
>Jim Dory
>Engineering
>City of Nome
>PO Box 281
>102 Division St.
>Nome, AK 99762
>907.443.6604
>
>http://www.nomealaska.org
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>