Hi Blues,
Really need your feedback.
please help out by telling me which is better
and included your own opinion.
Drop me a personal mail if you want confidentiality.
Thanks.
Cheers
patrick
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:44:59 +0800
patricko <patricko (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> Hi Blues
>
> When I am working on porting and writing documentation.
>
>
>
> I came across a question that I am not able to answer myself. ("I cant convince myself openldap is better than FDS")
>
>
>
> Openldap vs. Fedora Directory Service (FDS).
>
>
>
>
> FDS is defacto for Redhat Distro and Openldap is considered second class.
>
> Openldap is small in footprint (w/o GUI) vs. FDS http-based management.
>
>
> Which is better for Bluequartz?
>
>
> Cheers
> patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:21:13 +0800
> patricko <patricko (at mark) staff.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Blues
> >
> >
> > I am porting CODB to Openldap 2.4.6 with Berkeley DB 4.6.21
> >
> > Will release my work in ***2008 August*** after I submit Openldap-BQ project to University.
> >
> > Openldap-BQ will run parallel with CODB
> >
> > Maybe can someone take over from where I stop and integrate into CentOS5 after August.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > cheers
> > patrick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:30:01 -0500 (EST)
> > "Brian N. Smith" <brian (at mark) nuonce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > Tomcat 5
> > > > Maybe ASP
> > > > Mono
> > >
> > > You know, they do exist, free at
> > > http://www.nuonce.net/bluequartz.php
> > >
> > > Not sure if you knew or not. They have been there for a while.
> > >
> > > -Brian
> > >
>