Date:  Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:00:07 +0100
From:  =?UTF-8?Q?Tom_M=C3=BCller-Kortkamp?= <tmueko (at mark) kommunity.net>
Subject:  [coba-e:11651] Re: Project "Ellis" announcement
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <F84B10B5-B48F-4821-8D12-E5E3B9519BEE (at mark) kommunity.net>
In-Reply-To:  <20080101174459.0a8c5b32@patricko>
References:  <F87B3A89-2ED1-4933-B33B-D489B50EB08A (at mark) alpha.or.jp> <47629B93.3030 0 (at mark) enavn.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0712141529270.15992 (at mark) mail.nuonce.net> <20071215122113.5dfeda22 (at mark) patricko> <20080101174459.0a8c5b32 (at mark) patricko>
X-Mail-Count: 11651

Am 01.01.2008 um 10:44 schrieb patricko:

> Openldap vs. Fedora Directory Service (FDS).

Next to FDS there is another LDAP-Server (http://directory.apache.org/ 
apacheds/1.5/) which we shouldn't use;-) IMHO OpenLDAP is very wide  
spread and can be seen stable (fds and ads are yals (yet another ldap  
server:-)))

So I vote for OpenLDAP...


tmueko