Zeffie,
I am not saying anything to offend you, but stating the core values of
CentOS. If you disagree with them, then take it up with them not with
this list. Perhaps a better approach will be to show the community how
you are better that the rest will work best instead of snippy comments
here and there which is only working against you.
From the CentOS site...
How long after redhat publishes a fix does it take for CentOS to publish
a fix?
http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=7
Regards,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Zeffie [mailto:bluequartzlist (at mark) hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:43 PM
To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Subject: [coba-e:11528] Re: What really happeded to the mail
"are you Serious right now?"
> Just to clarify a bit things for the users. www.bluequartz.org is the
> official community members site. If you have your business elsewhere,
we
> are happy for you, but we are not your personal advertizing agent. \
? I don't recall asking you to do anything to advertize my work ?
> Of
> course we have others doing business with BQ, but none of them go as
far
> as you have stating that are "better options" as you have said.
So are you saying I should run my life based on how they act or are you
saying the entire list should act like them?
either way, I don't think so!
> I guess you are also criticizing Redhat as that is what CentOS is.
After
> redhat releases a patch CentOS will have updates 24 hours later and in
> 72 hours to the repositories at the most.
>
> Therefore, your web site is misleading and incorrect.
Do you really think redhat came out with 80+ updates 3 days ago? Try
over
the last few months...
I'll post seperatly about those for you. (time permitting)
> " Currently there are no updates for the BlueQuartz with the CentOS
4.x
> operating system. This means important services like Apache, Proftp
and
> other things can develop Security Holes that will not be closed and
> could present a Security Problem!"
>
> But, we just had a bunch of updates correct?
nope.. but you did get 2 that you didn't want.
> I understand you want more business and that is fine, but doing it at
> the expense of trashing someone else's work is another story. The
> concept behind BQ is different than yours perhaps, but we don't go as
> far as criticizing your code or approach.
> Paul
Trashing? I just pointed out how things actually worked. I'm sorry if
you
don't understand that.
Now if you don't mind I need to work on other things including the post
form
him criticizing my code and approach.
--
Zeffie...
http://www.zeffie.com/
Now I build it and You surf it!
Cobalt RaQ Repairs, Development, and Maintenance.
Home of the Worlds Largest Collection of RaQ Updates!
Cobalt Spam Filter, Security, Firewall, Anti Virus Products.
Yahoo: wwwZeffie ... Aim: wwZeffie ... Msn wwZeffie (at mark) hotmail.com ...
US 734-446-0350 734-454-9117 US Toll Free 800-231-4459 UK 0208-150-6860