Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:06:43 -0500
From:  "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmobley (at mark) uhostme.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:11401] Re: Anyone know of a Chat room style software for groups of people that can be somewhat secured
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <014c01c83c7c$c9c1c630$6400a8c0@HPPAVILION>
In-Reply-To:  <475F4316.1040903 (at mark) archiefamily.com>
References:  <003701c83c3f$f8fee640$e5b418ac (at mark) dell> <475F4316.1040903 (at mark) archiefamily.com>
X-Mail-Count: 11401

Paul, I too run Flashchat, version 4.5.7, and have happily served as many as
38 chatters at one time.  Server load was off the hook, but it managed, and
I have my refresh set at 5 seconds.

Have you ever played with the FlashChat socket server?  I have never been
able to get it to run.  I had you install "screen" via yum to even run the
daemon starting script, but it never really started.  When you check ps for
the presence of screen and the runServer.php command line, it isn't there.
The process number in the PID file isn't anywhere to be found either, so I
suspect that it can't start the socket server on the port I am trying to
use.  I have tried 9090 and 1080 without success.

Any tips you could pass my way if you have it working would be appreciated.

Is there something else I may be overlooking?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Archambault [mailto:paul (at mark) archiefamily.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:11 PM
> To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
> Subject: [coba-e:11398] Re: Anyone know of a Chat room style software for
> groups of people that can be somewhat secured
> 
> On a shared server with a few hundred other sites perhaps but the
> developer is working or has a version 4.80 release which takes some of
> the load off of the php database.  I run it on my BQ box here and it
> works great for me.  But to each his/her own, I like it because it has a
> lot of options and is much more easy on the eyes than your conventional
> perl based chat rooms.
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Isn't it a bit heavy on server?
> >
> > I once used it for a small site and remember there were some load
> issues,
> > when the site had ~150 users (registered, not concurrent), so I spared
> it.
> > Then again, it was at least 2 years ago...YMMV
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > --
> >
> > Arthur Sherman
> >
> >
> >
> >