Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:46:16 +0100
From:  Dogsbody <dan (at mark) dogsbody.org>
Subject:  [coba-e:10884] Re: Replacing Majordomo
To:  coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Message-Id:  <4710E848.9050004 (at mark) dogsbody.org>
In-Reply-To:  <20071013153614.1067a371@patricko>
References:  <470F7D5D.2040407 (at mark) dogsbody.org> <20071013153614.1067a371 (at mark) patricko>
X-Mail-Count: 10884


> Some Blues love Mailman and we have it in repository.

You have Mailman in repository??  Tested and usable??


> But I am talking about why not use 2.x majordomo.
> 2.x majordomo is active (like BQ only active in mailing list)

If it's still active then it's definitely something to look at, especially if 
it's a plug-in replacement.  I must admit I looked at majordomo 2 and thought it 
was a dead project!  Mind you, people coming to the BQ site probably think the 
same! :-/


Dan