Quite frankly.
Some Blues love Mailman and we have it in repository.
Others used the old 1.x majordomo on BQ.
But I am talking about why not use 2.x majordomo.
2.x majordomo is active (like BQ only active in mailing list)
<the latest post is on 12 Oct as of this mail>
....
From: Michael Yount <myount07 (at mark) verizon.net>
To: Mj2 Development Lists <mj2-dev (at mark) lists.mj2.org>
Subject: Re: Question about Sender
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:38:13 -0700
Sender: mj2-dev-owner (at mark) lists.mj2.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604)
....
From: Michael Yount <csf (at mark) moscow.com>
To: mj2-dev (at mark) lists.mj2.org
Subject: Re: Need guidance upgrading older MJ2 installation to current
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:42:24 -0800
Sender: mj2-dev-owner (at mark) lists.mj2.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
On 08 Feb 12:04, James Olsen wrote:
> I've been running majordomo2 for awhile now, and I've recently
> started having problems with my installation. Judging the by dates on
> some of my files (May 2003) I thought I'd upgrade to the latest
> version of MJ2.
Do you have the .mj_config file for your current installation?
[...]
See the README.UPGRADE file for a list of incompatibilities.
> Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with CVS to see if there is a
> way I could get a changelist from May 2003; but even then I might not
> understand the necessary action's I'd need to perform on my system to
> be compatible with the changes made in the code.
The changes are documented in the ChangeLog file.
> Any guidance on the best way to upgrade an existing installation is
> appreciated.
On CSF, I would run
perl Makefile.PL
make
make test
followed by
mj_shutdown -t 300
to put the queue server on hold for five minutes, and finally
make install
Michael
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:57:49 +0100
Dogsbody <dan (at mark) dogsbody.org> wrote:
>
> Yes I know this has been discussed a number or times but a few people
> were working on this and we haven't heard anything for a while!?
>
> Two of my servers have now been permanently blocked from sending mail to
> hotmail/msn and I am pretty sure it's due to Majordomo!
>
> I was considering moving a couple of problem sites off to other IP
> addresses but thinking about it all mailing list mail all goes through
> sendmail and I guess that uses the systems main IP!?
>
> Any other ideas, personally I would like this more than CentOS 5
> support! :-/
>
> Thank you
>
> Dan
>