Hi Bill,
Well, it does work, and has always worked, even on the MIPS based RaQs.
I have had a RaQ3 with over 300 sites on one single IP.
Taco
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Berg" <billberg (at mark) northernweb.net>
To: <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:52 PM
Subject: [coba-e:10451] Re: {Spam?} RE: IP addresses
>
> Not getting an error, cuz we haven't actually tried it yet.
> I just remember reading in the old Cobalt manual that it wouldn't work.
> So for all these years we never tried it.
>
> Bill Berg
> Northern Webworks
> 715-627-0400 or 1-866-572-1333
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Waugh [mailto:gwaugh (at mark) frontstreetnetworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:31 PM
> To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
> Subject: [coba-e:10449] {Spam?} RE: IP addresses
>
> You wrote;
>> I know that on the old Raq's you could have virtual domains that had
>> their own IP addresses, or you could have virtual domains that shared
>> one IP address. What you could not do was have two or more shared IP
>> addresses, for instance you couldn't have 10 sites using one IP
>> address and 15 sites using another one.
>
> I don't recall that problem.
>
>> Is that still a restriction on CentoS/BQ? I've purchased a server that
>> can easily handle the sites that are now on two separate Raq's. It
>> would be easiest to just use the CMU from each server and combine them
>> on the new box. I don't want to have to change the DNS entries for all
>> of the sites from one of the servers.
>>
> We may need more information.
> What error do you get when creating new sites on an IP?
> You may need to cmuImport using -i to import the sites.
>
> -
> Gerald Waugh
> http://frontstreetnetworks.com
> Front Street Networks
> 4604 Fern Ave
> Shreveport, LA 71105-3118
> V: 318-862-3575/3577
> F: 318-862-3576
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.20/919 - Release Date: 7/26/2007
> 9:56 AM
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>